I heard Friday (May 1st) that Xmen, the first movie, was the worst of the franchise. Why? Because it's boring. Im going to start out by saying, that the reason I loved the original XMen movie, was because it took familar stories and changed them for a film. I dont like the idea of perfectly translating a story from comic to film because we have seen it before and know the story. Xmen was the first comic book story in a decade that was successfully translated into film. It was a set up, not only for the Xmen franchise. But for every comic book movie we have seen since. It certainly is not the most action packed, but does this make a movie "the worst"? I would argue that because of the great dialogue (minus a line about toads and lightning) and the depth of issues handled by director Bryan Singer, Xmen successfully set the stage and rolled out the red carpet for the dozens of comic book movies we have seen since. Not only that, but it continues to stand as one of the best superhero movies, ever. I ask, do you think Quinten Tarentino thought that successful dialogue might be more of a 'bang' to end the Kill Bill series as opposed to perhaps ending it in a showdown of sparks, fire, and explosions? Fancy special effects are what makes a movie a "popcorn" movie. Great story advanced by character development then mixed with great action and effects makes a movie we will remember. It is then we come to identify with the main characters, and like them. As opposed to forgetting them quickly.
Sorry, I digress, so when I talk about Wolverine, and how it was or was not like the comics, I do not mean I wish for a faithful adaptation like Watchmen. I simply mean that what changed or didnt change, did or did not bother me. Capiche?
Wolverine was both good and bad. It was tremendously silly and overly dramatic, but had enough going on to keep people from leaving the theatre (if they managed to get past the dreadful first scene). I do not think that people will look back in a year and say "wow, wolverine was so awesome!". I think that, as far as movies go, this one seems like a lot of, for lack of better wording, stuff...... all happening at once. Read this article for a professionals explination who thinks of better wording than my 'stuff'. It sums everything up nicely:
http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/weekendroundup_4_30_09.html
Now if you have seen the movie, go ahead and read on. If not ***spoiler alert****
OK, so like I said earlier, Wolverine was waaaaay too dramatic. I get that Logan likes to yell and throw his claws out to the side. But really? Do we have to see him screaming and looking to the sky quite so many times? And Sabertooths teeth baring? We get it, you have fangs.
Then there is the Weapon X scene. Now, when I said eariler that I didnt want to see things done like the comic? Well this is excluded. This was so tainted with prissyness, I wouldnt be surprised to see a soilder holding a barbie doll while it was happening. What happened to those great teaser shots from X2? Where was the blood? Where was the seriousness? And why was it so freaken short!? Its one of the biggest moments in comic history - Wolverine and his claws, where is the flippin justice!? I dont understand how things like this get botched. (Venom in Spiderman, Phoenix in Xmen, and now this...) And the nudity. The scene seemed almost only about showing Hugh Jackman's ass. Nuidity does not fit into this franchise. It makes it seem odd, and extremely out of place. (need I remind everyone that Bryan Singer didnt feel it was needed either) It would be like if someone said that neo and trinity having sex while some giant nudist rager was happening next door sounds like a good idea. But thank God that didnt happen. Phew!
Ok, next up is the blob. What a pointless waste of time. What a stupid fight scene. That needed to get cut, entirely and just have the cool(ish) teleporting black guy tell him about Gambit. And speaking of Gambit.... WTF. Do I even mention how pitiful his existence in the series became? How silly he looked? How it looked like he was part of the circus flipping and jumping around. He was one of my (and most fans) favorites, and geeze that was silly.
So, the adimantium bullets I thought was a neat addition. But why does Striker have to explain that shooting him in the head will make him loose his memory? That basically TELLS the audience he is going to get shot in the head. It would have been so much cooler if he left out the prediction of what would happen.
Alright, and then we have weapon 11.... deadpool. The super mutant. Who, is not really even that cool. (not to mention hes played by ryan Reynolds and very possibly having his own sequel). Having someone too good, no flaws, makes them boring. And to give them their own sequel makes me want to throw up. Maybe he can do more of that dancing/swinging his sword around like he did the first time he pulled those swords out, because that was awesome.... And finally.... my final greviance..... why, oh why.... does Sabertooths memory stay in tact?! If this is a prequel, then it is supposed to tie into X1. And need I remind America (again) that Sabertooth was in it! And not once does he seem to have a vendetta against old wolverine. Sure they fight.... but pfft. He should then know wolverine is his dear old bro.
But, in all honesty, this movie had redeming qualities. I thought the action, for the most part, was good. It was fun to watch and.... (minus sabertooths jumping around on all fours) was pretty well done. The end was cool with the escaping mutants while the plant gets demolished by wolverine, sabertooth and deadpool. And let me tell you, I didnt think I would like the classic xmutants making cameos, but was totally happy with cyclops's appearence! It was subtle enough to not bother me. But, OMG... When he heard Patrick Stewart say "left".... I nearly wet myself. That was so freaken awesome. Whoever thought to stick ole Xavier in there, needs a big hug from me. But whoever did the horrible anti-aging graphics... does not get a hug. I also liked the other mutants. Im glad that they were not all big names fromt he series (they might be, but I hadnt heard of any of them). I prefered them being mostly nameless because I wasnt as attached to how their story was done.
So, I know this sounds very wishy washy... but would I recommend this movie to you? Probably not. Unless you dont enjoy the comics. Then go check it out and enjoy a lot of explosions and other Michael Bay-ish type action.
Bryan Singer, director of the first two X-Men films will be brought back. The dismay the fans endured after X3, then followed by Wolverine:Origins can never truely be forgotten by some (Im speaking mainly of myself... who is a huge fan... and cannot get over that bloody 3rd film)! But this might be diminished now that Singer is back on board! No... he is not going to do what I wished he would (redo the third film... or even do a 4th... that actually focused on Jean Grey's darker side), but an origin film. This one is called "X-Men: First Class" and will be focusing on the younger students.
An "Avengers" movie is on the way. The superhero group includes leader Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson), Iron Man (Robert Downey Jr.), and Hulk (Edward Norton). All of whom have been in movies. The group also consists of Ant-Man, Wasp, Captain America, and Thor - who is next in line for having their own blockbuster.
